Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Mega-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging in 493 patients with functional neurological disorder
Free
  1. Matt Butler1,*,
  2. Miriam Vignando1,*,
  3. Jane Allendorfer2,
  4. Thomas Hassa3,
  5. Silvina Horovitz4,
  6. Jacobus FA Jansen5,
  7. Johannes Jungilligens6,
  8. Wesley T Kerr7,
  9. Lenny Marapin8,
  10. Enrico Premi9,
  11. Aleksandar Ristic10,
  12. Teresa Serranova11,
  13. Petr Sojka12,
  14. Daichi Sone13,
  15. Quinton Deeley1,
  16. Jerzy Szaflarski2,
  17. Ariel Schoenfeld3,
  18. Mark Hallet4,
  19. John M Stern7,
  20. Noriko Salamon7,
  21. Dawn S Elashiv7,
  22. Jeannette Gelauff8,
  23. Marina de Koning-Tijssen8,
  24. Barbara Borroni9,
  25. Mauro Magoni9,
  26. Noriko Sato13,
  27. Sara Paredes Echeverri14,
  28. Ibai Diez14,
  29. David Perez14,
  30. Selma Aybek15,
  31. Mitul Mehta1,*,
  32. Timothy Nicholson1,*
  1. 1Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London
  2. 2University of Alabama at Birmingham
  3. 3Lurija Institute for Rehabilitation and Health Sciences
  4. 4National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  5. 5Maastricht University Medical Center
  6. 6Ruhr University Bochum
  7. 7University of California, Los Angeles
  8. 8University Medical Center Groningen
  9. 9ASST Spedali Civili
  10. 10University of Belgrade
  11. 11Charles University, Prague
  12. 12Masaryk University
  13. 13National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo
  14. 14Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group at Mass General Hospital
  15. 15Insel Gruppe Ag, Inselspital

Abstract

Background Despite a resurgence of research in functional neurological disorder (FND), knowledge of its pathophysiology is limited. To date, structural neuroimaging studies have typically been underpowered and have produced heterogenous findings. Mega-analyses combine individual raw participant data from multiple studies, substantially increasing statistical power and the ability to probe the complex pathophysiology of FND.

Methods In this FND Society Neuroimaging Committee initiative, international research groups with magnetic resonance imaging data of functional motor or seizure patients and healthy controls were invited to send T1-weighted images (pre-processed or unprocessed) and associated clinical variables. Key morphometric features such as cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and subcortical volumes were extracted using the Destrieux cortical atlas (Freesurfer 6.0.0) and harmonised to account for multi-centre variance with an empirical Bayesian approach (ComBat). Following ANOVAs corrected for multiple comparisons, cohorts were compared with MANCOVAs adjusted for age, sex, and total intracranial volume.

Results Fifteen groups contributed. The final dataset consisted of 564 age- and sex-matched controls and 493 patients, some of whom had both symptom subtypes (overall 314 motor symptoms, 193 seizures). Mean age 38.1 years for FND; 75.5% female. The FND cohort showed reduced cortical thickness in regions including the bilateral paracentral gyri and sulci, bilateral superior precentral sulci, and bilateral superior frontal sulci; varying fontal, occipital, and temporal regions showed reduced cortical surface area; volumes were reduced in regions including the bilateral putamen and hippocampi. In every case, the differences were small (ηp 2 <0.016). Significant regions survived a manual leave-one-out analysis. The motor FND subtype contributed most to the differences. Binarised clinical variables were available for ~60% patients. Some of the reduced cortical thicknesses, particularly in the superior frontal and precentral regions, were associated with a history of depression. None of the differences were associated with history of anxiety, antidepressant use, or illness duration (years).

Discussion This international collaboration mega-analysis represents the largest structural imaging study in FND to date. Results suggest FND is associated with small reductions in cortical thickness, surface area, and volumes, particularly in frontal, motor, and subcortical regions. Future research should investigate whether findings are of aetiological significance or are secondary to the condition, and whether they are specific to FND or are also seen in related disorders. Further granular analysis, for example via receptor density mapping, could further elucidate the pathophysiology of this disabling disorder. Consensus regarding the minimum clinical variables to collect in future FND research is required.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.